ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
This prospective randomized comparative study was done at Helwan University Hospital. It was conducted on 120 patients with unilateral pelvic renal stones from 1.5 to 3 cm in largest diameter who was admitted through duration to compare the two procedures differences in terms of complications, analgesic use, hospital stay, operational time, and stone-free rates.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of ESWL and Mini-PCNL for High-Density Renal Stones in Children#841361
- Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones#1161398
- F-URS and Mini PCNL for Pediatric Urolithiasis#804934
- Standard PCNL Vs Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) for Complex Nephrolithiasis in Obese Patients#875226
- RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones#1229582
Record · ID 1475856
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive