ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Study of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus RFA in the Treatment of Recurrent HCC
To observe and compare the short-term and long-term oncological outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma .
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Treatment of Recurrent HCC With Repeat Hepatectomy,and TACE With AFP Conversion#828306
- Laparoscopic or Open Liver Resection Versus Multibipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of HCC Within Milan Criteria on Cirrhosis#1470118
- Effects of Anesthetic Methods on Hepatic Cancer Cell Malignancy#1421186
- Sorafenib Plus TACE Versus Sorafenib Alone as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment for Resectable Primary Advanced HCC#906552
- Neoadjuvant Triple Therapy for Resectable HCC#899025
Record · ID 1476882
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive