ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Parasternal vs. Sternotomy Approach for Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement
Prospective randomized study comparing aortic valve replacement using parasternal or sternotomy access with regard to quality of life and systemic inflammatory reaction.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Balloon Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Without Predilation of the Aortic Valve#807797
- Safety and Efficacy of the HighLife Transcatherter Mitral Valve Replacement System in Patients With Moderate-severe or Severe Mitral Regurgitation in China#1212996
- Safety and Efficacy of SinocrownTM Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System#812586
- Valvular Surgery: Minimally Invasive vs Conventional Sternotomy#1294993
- The China Mviv Registry#865237
Record · ID 1477562
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive