ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Minimally Invasive Open Preperitoneal Surgery With Polysoft Mesh Versus a Classic Open Surgery With Light Weight Mesh
This is a prospective randomized study to evaluate the recovery of a hernia inguinalis by a minimally invasive open preperitoneal surgery with polysoft mesh versus a classic open surgery according to modified Lichtenstein procedure with light weight mesh.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair#1008117
- Inguinal Hernia Operation and Postoperative Pain#1214232
- Comparative Study on Self-adhesive Mesh for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair#1430278
- A Study to Determine if Mesh Placement During Bladder Surgery Can Reduce the Chances of Developing a Hernia#1407510
- The Significance of the Mesh Thickness in the Operation of Inguinal Hernia#1378071
Record · ID 1478299
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive