CanLII
metadata only
Hans v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-27. Docket: 26-T-340. Citation: 2026 CanLII 113765 (FC). Administrative law — Judicial review — COVID-19 benefits administration — Extension of time motion to commence judicial review of CRA decision — Whether proposed application has some potential merit on reasonableness or procedural fairness — Procedural fairness for COVID-19 benefits at the low end of the spectrum — Refusal to conduct second review when request filed late upheld — Motion dismissed | Procedure — Time limits — Federal Courts Act, subs. 18.1(2) — Whether Applicant showed a continuing intention to challenge the decision for the entire delay period — Viewed decision letter the same day but no evidence of steps until July — Notice of Application and affidavit prepared months later — Continuing intention not
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sui v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1481032
- Suppa Et Al. v. Canada (Attorney General) Et Al.#1079783
- Smoum v. Canada (Attorney General)#1391010
- Hyder v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1359994
- Kanobana Et Al. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1481023
Record · ID 1481022
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive