PsyArXiv
metadata only
The Good, the Bad, and the Vengeful: Evaluations of Standing up for Oneself versus Having Another’s Back
Bystander evaluations are a relatively unexplored area of retaliation, yet they are crucial to the reputations through which people navigate the social world. Further, though generally deriding harm, people are often forced to contend with it. By examining how people evaluate retaliation—or the choi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Good, the Bad, and the Vengeful: Evaluations of Standing up for Oneself versus Having Another’s Back#1481262
- Against Social Justice, For Social Mercy#708613
- Social Sanctions, Criticism, and Speech#97202
- The Status-Punishment Paradox: Status-Amplified Schadenfreude, Moralized Reputational Aggression, and the Digital Afterlife of Punishment#694252
- Judging Because Understanding: A Defence of Retributive Censure#753269
Record · ID 1481189
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive