PsyArXiv
metadata only
New Voices for Environmental Causes: The Psychological Basis of Different Reactions to Posts by Human and Virtual Greenfluencers
The present paper systematically investigates audience reactions to posts by human greenfluencers versus virtual greenfluencers controlled by humans or AI. Drawing on persuasion theory and research, we hypothesized that posts by human versus human-controlled versus AI-controlled virtual influencers
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Thinking Less to Simulate Better: Intuitive Prompting Improves LLM Agents Simulating Individual Social Media Reactions, Including Unfamiliar Content#1104762
- Do LLMs Change Their Minds Like Humans? Diagnosing Human--LLM Divergence in Single-Turn Persuasion Judgments#798428
- Do LLMs Change Their Minds Like Humans? Diagnosing Human--LLM Divergence in Single-Turn Persuasion Judgments#797015
- Dual Pathways From Online Green Content Engagement to Green Conspicuous Consumption and Green eWOM: A Conceptual Model of Brand Authenticity, Social Influence, Trust, and Social Approval#416332
- Identity-Based Motivation and Green Purchase Intentions: The Mediating Role of Conspicuous Signaling#178333
Record · ID 1481200
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive