ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Oral Metolazone and Intermittent Intravenous Furosemide Versus Continuous Infusion Furosemide in Acute Heart Failure
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, open-label study is to compare two diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): the addition of an oral thiazide diuretic to intravenous bolus (IVB) loop diuretic will be compared to transition from IVB to continuous infusion (CI) loop diuretic.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Metolazone As Early Add On Therapy For Acute Decompensated Heart Failure#910694
- DAPAgliflozin Versus Thiazide Diuretic in Patients With Heart Failure and Diuretic RESISTance#1031005
- Dapagliflozin Effects on Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Patients With an Acute Heart Attack.#1010380
- Patients With Heart Failure ANd Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Placebo Or Metformin (PHANTOM) Pilot Study#249571
- Comparison of Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure Taking Standard Treatment#148652
Record · ID 1483794
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive