ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Compare Subperiosteal and Loco-Regional Anesthesia in Posterior Mandible Dental Implant Installation
In patients that are going to receive a dental implant in the posterior mandible (distal from canine), does the subperiosteal anesthetic technique with Articaine 1:100.000 4 % Epinephrine compared to the loco-regional one, produces the same analgesia during surgery ?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does Local Morphine Add to Local Anesthetics in Serratus Anterior Plane Block Has a System Analgesic Effect?#834179
- Testing the Anesthetic Effectiveness of Three Different Dental Local Anesthetics Injected Next to a Lower First Molar#1443198
- Lidocaine vs. Lidocaine With Dexmedetomidine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA) in Upper Limb Surgery#844365
- Efficacy of 4% Articaine Terminal Anesthesia in the Lateral Jaw Region in Children#1213396
- Intravenous or Intra-abdominal Local Anesthetics for Postoperative Pain Management.#1281630
Record · ID 1483916
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive