ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Audiological Benefit and Improved Quality of Life With Two Bone Conduction Systems: ADHEAR vs. Bonebridge in Experienced Users
Patients implanted with a Bonebridge will be asked to be part of the study. The study subjects are enrolled into the study according to inclusion criteria. Patients will be asked to wear an adhesive bone conduction device an adapt to it for 30-60 min. After this time period patients will be asked to use the adhesive device instead of the Bonebridge for 3 weeks. Audiologic Tests and quality of life questionnaires will be assessed at the beginning of the study and at the end of three weeks.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Study of Non-surgical Hearing Devices Based on Bone Conduction#1261907
- Clinical Performance of a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Solution (Baha® Attract System)#903015
- Early Experience of a New Implant System for Bone Conduction Hearing in the Pediatric Population#1033550
- Consensus Statement on Bone Conduction Devices and Active Middle Ear Implants in Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss#15450
- Zink and Bone Strength#1100743
Record · ID 1485744
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive