ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparative Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss Around the Implant When Using PEEK With Composite Veneering Versus Monolithic Zirconia Restorations as Implant Restorations
This study compares two different materials used for screw-retained dental implant restorations in the front of the upper jaw (the "esthetic zone"). The goal is to determine which material is better at preserving the bone level around the implant over time and how this will affect the survival rate of the restorations
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Peri-implant Soft Tissue Response to Direct Zirconia-Based Composite Customized Healing Abutment#1173570
- Prosthetic Complications in Full-arch Screw-retained Implant Restorations Using Monolithic Zirconia Versus Titanium Frameworks: A Randomized Clinical Trial#894303
- Clinical Assessment Of Inlay Retained Bridge Designs (Tub Shaped And Inlay Shaped) In Missing Posterior Teeth Cases.#1377393
- Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars.#1486033
- Parent Satisfaction With Zirconia, Bioflx, and 3D-Printed Crowns for Primary Molars#866008
Record · ID 1487202
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive