arXiv (All)
open access
The Precautionary Principle and the Innovation Principle: Incompatible Guides for AI Innovation Governance?
In policy debates concerning the governance and regulation of Artificial Intelligence (AI), both the Precautionary Principle (PP) and the Innovation Principle (IP) are advocated by their respective interest groups. Do these principles offer wholly incompatible and contradictory guidance? Does one ne
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why we need an AI-resilient society#128239
- AI and Consumer Rights in India Working Paper#1356153
- AI Governance and the Policymaking Process: Key Considerations for Reducing AI Risk#774417
- Technological impact, generality, and complementarity of artificial intelligence patents: Evidence from Samsung Electronics#159572
- Technological impact, generality, and complementarity of artificial intelligence patents: Evidence from Samsung Electronics.#157909
Record · ID 1488216
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive