arXiv (All)
open access
Improving Group Deliberation through AI-Guided Self-Reflection
As AI systems increasingly mediate human communication, identifying conditions under which they augment collective sense-making is a critical challenge. Through a randomized experiment (N=1,173 U.S. participants across 391 small-group deliberations), we investigate whether AI-guided self-reflection
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Qualia Emergence through Functional Complementarity: Mutual Deepening and Boundary Dissolution in Human-AI Dialogue#113621
- Knowledge-Certainty Diversity Predicts Human-Human and Human-AI Open-Ended Discussion Synergy and Reveals Pure-AI Discussion Shortfalls#1412731
- Beyond Anthropomorphism: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Non-humanity and Structural Similarity in Deep Self-Disclosure Toward Generative AI#180706
- ArguScale: Evidence-Grounded Human-AI Sensemaking Across Concurrent Live Conversations#1326569
- “I Really Feel Heard by AI”: A Cultural Case Study of AI-Mediated Listening Across China and the UK.#645375
Record · ID 1488654
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive