arXiv (All)
open access
Right Numbers, Wrong Questions: Evaluating LLMs on Underspecified Financial Queries
Financial assistants answer questions that sound factual but depend on what the user leaves unsaid: what a data figure measures, which product variant is meant, and the investor's situation and the rules that apply. An assistant that ignores these can still answer with a real number from its data, o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Enhancing Financial Question Answering: A Novel Benchmark Dataset of Banks' financial statements#985268
- IGT @ FinMMEval 2026 Task 2: Question-Type Prompting with Targeted Extraction for Multilingual Financial QA#985524
- FinInteract: Benchmarking Clarification and Intent Integration in Ambiguous Financial Question Answering#1050191
- Firm Characteristics and Firm Value of Non-Financial Firms Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya#436375
- Towards Expert Financial QA via Self-Improving RAG#1063994
Record · ID 1489701
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive