arXiv (All)
open access
Gold vs.~Translation: Are We Measuring Language, Knowledge, or Locality in Translated Benchmarks?
Translated versions of English-origin benchmarks such as MMLU are widely used to evaluate large language models in non-English languages, yet it remains unclear whether they measure the same constructs as natively created benchmarks. We frame this as a proxy validity question and compare DeepL-trans
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ladders in Chaos: When, How, (and Perhaps Why) Does Test-Time Scaling Improve LLM Machine Translation#818663
- Ladders in Chaos: When, How, (and Perhaps Why) Does Test-Time Scaling Improve LLM Machine Translation#808671
- The Invalsi Benchmarks: measuring Linguistic and Mathematical understanding of Large Language Models in Italian#625557
- Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making#359604
- From Fuzzy to Exact: The Halo Architecture for Infinite-Depth Reasoning via Rational Arithmetic#1412765
Record · ID 1489858
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive