arXiv (All)
open access
When Should AI Decide, Defer, and Deviate? Responsible Automation for Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation
We ask when an AI trained on historical decisions should be allowed to recommend decisions, defer to human experts, or in other cases, flag concerning patterns in data and deviate from past practice. This can be challenging because past decisions record what was done rather than what should have bee
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial intelligence in blood donor management: A narrative review.#1357
- What a Philosopher Learned at an AI Ethics Evaluation#694013
- Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic#335811
- Medical artificial intelligence ethics: A systematic review of empirical studies#686493
- Explicability of artificial intelligence in radiology: Is a fifth bioethical principle conceptually necessary?#85981
Record · ID 1490115
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive