arXiv (All)
open access
Poisoning Agentic Alpha: Adversarial Vulnerabilities Across Roles and Architectures in Multi-Agent Trading Systems
and-scienceartificial-intelligencecomputational-engineeringcryptography-and-securityfinancemultiagent-systems
LLM-based multi-agent trading systems are moving from research prototypes to live deployments that control real assets. They ingest news and social media from the open web and pass it between agents, so a single corrupted signal can reach the final decision and cause financial loss. We study two adv
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Worse Together: How Performance Breaks Down in Multi-User Multi-Agent Teams#1155518
- Can We Trust AI Agents? A Case Study of an LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for Ethical AI#652027
- Can We Trust AI Agents? A Case Study of an LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for Ethical AI#650574
- AgentMercury: Your Agent Can Synthesize Verifiable Environments for Business Scenarios at scale#659196
- AgentMercury: Your Agent Can Synthesize Verifiable Environments for Business Scenarios at scale#657060
Record · ID 1490610
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive