arXiv (All)
open access
Towards Full-Text Scholarly Argument Mining using Entity-Anchored Claim Extraction
Argument mining in full-text scholarly articles remains an important yet challenging task. This difficulty stems not only from the need to model long-distance dependencies but also from the substantial effort required to annotate sentence-level argumentative components throughout lengthy documents.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Argument-based approaches for enhancing automated fact-checking and generating explanations#124352
- Improving Argument Saliency Coverage in Small LLMs for Long Legal Opinion Summarization via Sequence-Level Distillation#799137
- Improving Argument Saliency Coverage in Small LLMs for Long Legal Opinion Summarization via Sequence-Level Distillation#797714
- Mining legal arguments in court decisions#269860
- Using Argument Mining for Legal Text Summarization#679110
Record · ID 1491804
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive