Goldsmiths Research Online
metadata only
Reclaiming AI myths in education: Teachers’ labour, student subjectivity and the automated classroom
While edtech proponents and policymakers promise that artificial intelligence (AI) will reduce teacher workloads and personalise learning, these technologies often lead to increased administrative burdens, deskilling and deepened student inequalities. How do AI myths then persist despite these failu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Technological Competence, Training and Support, Attitude Towards AI, and Teachers’ Acceptance#1399455
- Where Artificial Intelligence Enters Teacher Work#1001856
- Where Artificial Intelligence Enters Teacher Work#1001776
- The Stories We Govern By: AI, Risk, and the Power of Imaginaries#171884
- Artificial Intelligence in Education, Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2007, July 9-13, 2007, Los Angeles, California, USA#489582
Record · ID 1492333
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive