Open Access LMU
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Science Communication against Misinformation
How can science communication sustain informed public dialogue during an era when academia and institutions in general are under mounting pressure from multiple societal forces? In this paper, we reflect on where science communication fails, and how to improve structures and incentives to strengthen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dismantling the deficit model of science communication using Ludwik Fleck’s theory of thinking collectives#98530
- When the Shot Backfires: Demonstrating How Science Communication Can Fail#676075
- The “bread and butter” of science: understanding how scientists communicate uncertainties#1081227
- Verstehen statt Fakten vermitteln: Ein Erkenntnistheoretisches Argument für Dialogbasierte Wissenschaftskommunikation#102149
- Generics in science communication: Misaligned interpretations across laypeople, scientists, and large language models.#385111
Record · ID 1493925
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive