bioRxiv / medRxiv
open access
Quality, Readability, and Content Deficiencies of Three Large Language Models in Bee Sting Health Information: A Comparative Evaluation with Patient Perspectives
ObjectiveTo evaluate the information quality, reliability, readability, and content deficits of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Doubao in answering frequently asked questions about bee stings. MethodsTwenty-five high-frequency patient questions were selected based on Google Trends, domestic health platforms
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Acute Effects of Motor Imagery and Physical Exercise on Tongue Strength and Pain Threshold in Healthy Adults#1087432
- Accuracy and response repeatability of three large language models on undergraduate operative dentistry multiple-choice questions.#631082
- The Manchester driving behavior questionnaire (DBQ) integrating health and technology factors: The DBQ 2025 update with translations in 11 languages#320311
- The Performances and Differences in Tongue Function Between Healthy Adults and Dysphagia in Patients With Stroke in Taiwan#917075
- A New Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale Short-Form for Deaf Children#1293108
Record · ID 1495254
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive