COMPARISON OF LUNG RECRUITABILITY ASSESSMENT BY HYSTERESIS RATIO AND RECRUITMENT-TO-INFLATION RATIO, AND PEEP TITRATION IN ARDS.

This multicenter, single-blind physiological study aims to compare two bedside methods for assessing lung recruitability in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): the recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio and the pressure-volume (PV) loop hysteresis ratio. Lung recruitability will be defined according to the reduction in lung collapse measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) during a standardized lung recruitment maneuver. Following baseline measurements, participants will undergo sequential physiological assessments, including lung recruitability evaluation using both the R/I ratio and a low-flow PV loop, a standardized lung recruitment maneuver with a decremental PEEP trial, and a second PV loop performed at a lower maximum inflation pressure. The order of the R/I ratio assessment and the PV loop maneuver will be randomized. In a final crossover phase, four different PEEP titration strategies will be evaluated in randomized order. Each strategy will be applied for 15 minutes and separated by a washout period at the patient's baseline clinical PEEP. Respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, ventilation/perfusion distribution, and hemodynamic variables will be assessed throughout the protocol. The primary objective is to determine the agreement between the hysteresis ratio and the R/I ratio for identifying lung recruitability. Secondary objectives include evaluating whether a PV loop performed with a lower maximum pressure provides similar information on recruitability and comparing the physiological effects of different PEEP titration strategies. Approximately 30 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS receiving invasive mechanical ventilation will be enrolled.