ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Putty Allograft vs. Putty Alloplast Graft
The primary aims of this study are to compare, after 4 months, the clinical and histologic results of a combination demineralized/mineralized putty allograft vs. synthetic calcium phosphosilicate (CPS) putty alloplast graft utilization in socket preservation procedures. A regenerative tissue matrix membrane will be used to cover each graft lying below the flap.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Performance, Safety and Benefit of the Wishbone HA as Bone Graft Substitute, a Pre-market Clinical Investigation#1445927
- The Use Of Pontic Shield Technique For Alveolar Ridge Preservation . A Case Series#831846
- Alveolar Ridge Sequelae Due to Peri-implantitis: a Retrospective Observational Study#1307405
- Application of Sticky Bone and Bio-Oss Collagen in Alveolar Ridge Preservation#966205
- Comparison Between Modified Periosteal Inhibition (MPI) and Flapless Immediate Implant Placement#1339382
Record · ID 1496604
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive