HAL (France)
open access
Between Rigor and Relevance: Why the EU HTA Guidelines on Indirect Comparisons Miss the Mark
Indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) are essential in the context of joint clinical assessments (JCAs) under Regulation (European Union [EU]) 2021/2282, bridging evidence gaps where head-to-head data are lacking and enabling assessment across diverse national patient, intervention, comparator, and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Therapeutic Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Acupressure Therapy Among Patients With Cervicogenic Headache#1198139
- Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v General Medical Council & Anor [2026] EWHC 1138 (Admin) (19 May 2026)#208209
- Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v General Medical Council & Anor [2026] EWHC 1138 (Admin) (19 May 2026)#208180
- Translation and validation of a German version of the "Hopkins Competency Assessment Test," a brief method for evaluating patients' capacity to give consent.#1415617
- Pilot Study Using Transcranial Electrostimulation (TESA-HB) Therapy for the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms#1214539
Record · ID 1500759
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive