A Critical Study of Atheism in Sartre's Philosophy from the Perspective of, Hikmat Muta`aliyah, Transcendent Wisdom

Man, as a being having the power of reason, has always sought to discover the truth of existence. One of the main questions in the field lies in finding the origin of the universe and how it came into being. In the meantime, the divine religions and the prophets, following the answer to this question, explained the principles of monotheism. Acceptance of Necessary Being is counted as a common principle of all divine religions and divine philosophers; But some thinkers always consider the Necessary Being to be contradictory; In their opinion, the existence of God cannot be proven. One of these atheist thinkers is Jean-Paul Sartre, who in his most important philosophical work as Existence and Non-Existence, mentions two main reasons for rejecting the Necessary. These two reasons, which are in fact critiques of Descartes and Leibniz's views on the Necessary, are one that seeks to prove the contradiction of the Necessary Being and the other rejects the logical necessity of That. He also sees the existence of God as a mowjud ligheyrih an obstacle to the realization of human freedom. Sartre restores freedom to human beings and frees human beings from any restraint, and for this reason, in his view, anything that prevents the realization of this inherent freedom cannot exist, and human beings, intending to escape from this freedom and responsibility, has made the concept of God. By explaining these reasons, this research intends to critique them with the principles of transcendent divine wisdom in which the Necessary Being has a fundamental role.