Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Axiomatic Normative System for Social Interpersonal Relations and Production-Distribution Arrangements

Wang, Kaining
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This paper constructs a self-consistent, closed, screenable normative system of social institutions by means of rigorous axiomatic deduction, taking five foundational normative axioms as the sole normative meta-premise. The research covers two core social domains: first, the interpersonal order constituted by intimate bonds, communal living, and child-rearing; second, the material production order consisting of labour organisation, control over means of production, and distribution of surplus output. Rejecting empirical induction, historical narration and subjective value preferences, this paper does not presuppose any single social institution, family form or economic model as the optimal paradigm. Rigid normative principles are deduced layer by layer from the axioms to demarcate absolutely prohibited boundaries and legitimate spheres of freedom for social institutions. The system strictly distinguishes four layers of logical structure: axioms, normative principles, institu- tional rules, and the feasible set of institutions. All institutionalised structures of personal subordination, coercive bonding, structural extraction of labour surplus and deprivation of basic rights that violate per- sonal equality, continuing voluntariness, non-domination of personhood and the baseline guarantee of subsistence are excluded from the feasible set of institutions. All plural institutional forms that do not cross the rigid red lines of the axioms fall within the sphere of institutional freedom available for social self-selection. This study ultimately proves that normative axioms merely delineate the justice baseline of social order and do not uniquely fix a single social form. Legitimate social order possesses multiple realisation paths, and all systems of structural oppression that breach the underlying normative baseline lack normative justification.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1504022
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive