Imposed Image: Access, Running Total, and Ascription

This note does not replace Functional Authored Agency and does not answer why there is a total rather than nothing. It adds two claims that belong beside the existing architecture. First: kind is the inherited license; use is the load actually running. Glow, in the human sense, is this license’s running total under load, not a light-switch. Imagination is internal output on the same menu. Second: self-access and other-access are one tool — authorship — run on two data conditions. Introspection is not contact with one’s own total. It is construction on high-bandwidth data. Reading another is the same construction on sparse data. Imagination is a real act with a real object. The error is treating the shortest gap as zero distance. Occupancy and the identity claim stay in Feeling as Licensed Operation. Score them there, not here. That a total can run without being pictured is assumed from that architecture — occupancy can be felt and unowned; self-picturing is authorship about the total — not derived in this note. Picturing a total, from inside or outside, is access. This note is the exclusive home of that access argument. FLO declined to house it.