PhilArchive
open access
Amatonormative pronatalism in East Asia: the limits of marriage-centred policies
Many East Asian countries experiencing birth rate decline strongly enforce the idea that marriage is the moral and legal foundation of childbearing. This has led to the implementation of what I call amatonormative pronatalism—policies aimed at increasing marriage rates to increase birth rates in those countries. I argue that amatonormative pronatalism is problematic both because its efficacy is limited and because it reinforces gender inequalities which are especially burdensome to women. I explore solutions that may help address these current challenges.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why not coercive pronatalism?#107260
- Lessons From Eugenics: Safeguarding Autonomy in Procreation#324367
- For Whom Are Child Protection Provisions Intended? An Argument about the Taiwan Railways Public Sex Event#251398
- Quest for 'What is Law in South Asia'#85396
- Levinasian view of child pornography and moral solution in the Philippine context#210292
Record · ID 1506363
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive