PhilArchive
open access
Why is Incest Wrong?: An introduction to Duality
Haidt et al. introduced the concept of “moral dumbfounding”. When asked about the morality of consensual incest using contraceptives, most participants of his psychological experiment categorised the act as wrong. This essay aims to explain why they and society consider incest, even consensual, “wrong”. By expanding Aristotle’s idea of potentiality and actuality, I propose the concept of duality based on similarity and differentiation in humans. I explain outward societal formation as a form of duality in human relations. Thus, I argue that incest makes the act of expansion done for maintaining duality, into one against it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Criminal Law to Customary Law: Incest as a Sexual Crime#1042593
- The Vices of Love and Rawlsian Justice#108243
- Child Marriage, Matri-Lianialism, Patrilinealism#1504296
- The Effect of Sexual Education-Counseling According to PLISSIT in Solving Sexual Problems in Women Using Contraceptive Methods: One Year Follow-up Results#1113652
- Should Marital Relations Be Non‐Hierarchical?#81020
Record · ID 1506630
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive