An Interval-Theoretical Critique of Peace-Compatible and Happiness-Related Operational Configurations Operational Configurations, Reflexive Construals, and Illusory Reification

Peace and happiness can correspond to real, heterogeneous relations even when a unified attribution outlasts the relations and reasons that justify its application. This paper distinguishes operational histories, construal retention, inferential entitlement, observation competence, and institutional uptake. It rejects the inference from interval divergence to illusion, and specifies conditions under which correction of a description, revision of its bodily and institutional enabling conditions, or local withdrawal of the description are different possible operations. The post-Brassierian extension reads enlightenment and extinction as a challenge to treating humanly stabilized categories as the final measure of reality, without predicting a beneficial nonhuman successor. Against inferential entitlement, structural-violence analysis, and looping classifications, the paper offers a bounded cross-domain procedure rather than a new ontological primitive. Synthetic experiments R10–R12, R18, R20, and R21 test limited classification and intervention mechanisms; in the information-matched R21 comparison, passive grounds logging confers no classification advantage. Neither philosophical reflection nor autonomous posthuman inquiry has been experimentally established. The R28 revision separates object change, observational change, conceptual revision, and task transformation; local redundancy of philosophical mediation cannot be equated with extinction or used to guarantee a successor.