bioRxiv / medRxiv
open access
CC0 1.0
Citation Hallucination Determines Success: An Empirical Comparison of Six Medical AI Research Systems
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Citation Hallucination Determines Success: An Empirical Comparison of Six Medical AI Research Systems#154100
- AI in Drug Discovery: Clinical Failures, Regulatory Reality, and the Validation Crisis Behind the Hype.#317814
- The Reliability Response to Patent Law’s AI Challenges#675742
- Patients' and Physicians' Perceptions of AI Integration in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Mixed Methods Study of Challenges to the Patient-Physician Relationship.#1158636
- Governing artificial intelligence in cancer care: Perspectives and recommendations from patient organizations and the MULTIR consortium#670221
Record · ID 151588
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive