Zenodo (CERN)
open access
THE USE OF FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY WITHOUT CONSENT: THE LEGAL BOUNDARY BETWEEN PUBLIC SECURITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY
This article analyzes the legal implications of deploying facial recognition technology (FRT) in public spaces without the explicit consent of the data subject. The study delineates the technological and legal distinctions between conventional video
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Regulating police use of facial recognition technology in the Netherlands: The complex interplay between criminal procedural law and data protection law#461773
- The Ethics of Police Body-Worn Cameras#772897
- Use Of Digitalization By Judicial, Police And Other Authorities To Prevent And Deal With Crime Before Arrest And After Arrest And Its Legal Recognition, Practical Issues, And Challenges#1335419
- CVE-2026-108476 — MEDIUM 5#1330324
- A co-produced framework for assessing common law basis of consent to enable record linkage for public good research.#423076
Record · ID 1527693
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive