arXiv (All)
open access
Characterizing LLM Agent Behaviors in Module Shadowing Environments
LLM agents operating in untrusted workspaces face the risk of untrusted code execution during routine tasks, yet final reports and workspace states alone cannot reliably establish whether execution occurred. We introduce an evaluation framework that codes observation, reasoning, execution, and respo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hidden in the Comments: A Context-Injection Attack Surface in Code LLMs#1201152
- AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents#229449
- Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation#168374
- Safeguarding LLM Agents against Long-Horizon Threats via Shadow Memory#1064897
- An Evaluation of Data Leakage Risks in Tool-Using LLM Agents in Realistic Scenarios#282741
Record · ID 1533570
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive