arXiv (All)
open access
From 1D Benchmarks to Complex 3D Geometries: Can Agents Reliably Specify Problems for Automated PDE Simulation?
Turning an engineering request into a simulation requires consistent geometry, physics, boundary conditions, and numerical settings. Recent agent-assisted systems automate simulation setup, but successful execution alone does not establish whether the specification preserves the intended problem or
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ParMMG2D: Functionalities Overview and User Parameters#1390407
- triangulax: Differentiable Simulations with Triangular Meshes across Soft Matter Physics.#1299654
- A Survey of AI Methods for Geometry Preparation and Mesh Generation in Engineering Simulation#1416006
- Can It Actually Work? Synthesizing Functional CAD Mechanisms#1402105
- Total Deformation-based MPM for Perfectly Elastic Solid Simulation with Strong Deformations#1468549
Record · ID 1534453
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive