arXiv (All)
open access
Reasoning Consensus: Structural Ensembling of LLM Reasoning via Weighted DAG Aggregation
Large Language Models (LLMs) reason in free-form chain-of-thought (CoT) without revealing which steps were well supported and which alternatives were rejected. In high-stakes domains, users then cannot judge if an answer rests on sound reasoning. Majority voting and multi-agent debate improve answer
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Abstract Activation Spaces for Content-Invariant Reasoning in Large Language Models#1488297
- Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning#1386888
- Argumentation for Explainable and Globally Contestable Decision Support with LLMs#798800
- Argumentation for Explainable and Globally Contestable Decision Support with LLMs#797386
- When LLMs Develop Languages: Symbolic Communication for Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning#1325206
Record · ID 1535550
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive