arXiv (All)
open access
Adversarial Robustness Is Not Zero-Day Generalization: A Controlled Evaluation of Flow-Based Intrusion Detectors on Corrected CIC-IDS2017
Synthetic variants of known attacks, including feature-space adversarial perturbations, are sometimes used as stand-ins for unseen ("zero-day") attacks when evaluating machine-learning network intrusion detection systems (NIDS). We test whether this proxy holds. On the corrected CIC-IDS2017 release
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An optimized graph neural network approach for robust and explainable IoT intrusion detection against adversarial attacks.#360935
- Robust Semi-Supervised Temporal Intrusion Detection for Adversarial Cloud Networks#13014
- Generalist Graph Anomaly Detection via Prototype-Based Distillation#792756
- Generalist Graph Anomaly Detection via Prototype-Based Distillation#788756
- RHINO: Guided Reasoning for Mapping Network Logs to Adversarial Tactics and Techniques with Large Language Models#1468128
Record · ID 1536536
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive