ScholarWorks@GSU
metadata only
Framing the Criminal Face: The Role of Appearance and Attribution in Negligence-Based Legal Decision-Making
Jurors’ legal judgments are influenced by extra-legal factors, such as a defendant’s appearance and case presentation. Facial criminality is a well-studied appearance-based cue: criminal-looking defendants tend to be assigned more blame and punishment, especially for violent, intentional crimes. How
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Juror decision making: Does juror stigma, mental health literacy, or the description of a defendant's mental health status, impact decision-making in a mock criminal trial?#9487
- Beyond the phenomenology of innocence: An exploratory study of innocent suspects’ reasoning about the disclosure of critical information in an investigative interviewing context#403393
- Metacognitive Awareness, Perceived Distinctiveness, and the Language Justifying Face Recognition#976999
- Innocent at Large#54956
- Disentangling Disparity: Exploring Racially Disparate Effect and Treatment in Capital Charging#683941
Record · ID 1537435
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive