PsyArXiv
metadata only
Bigger Sample, Worse Coverage: Pooled Imputation and the Difference Between Two Correlations
Researchers routinely ask whether two variables are more strongly related in one group than another, and one variable is often incomplete. Standard guidance recommends multiple imputation, but a common main-effects-only default forces a common slope on an analysis that lets groups differ: the imputa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Exploring the Use of Multiple Imputation for Handling Missing Covariates in Meta-regression with Dependent Effect Sizes#215929
- Impact of Group Size in Weight Loss Interventions#1186108
- Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models#6058
- Millennium Cohort Study: Sweeps 1-8, 2001-2025: Longitudinal Files#212314
- Mediation analysis in longitudinal intervention studies with an ordinal treatment-dependent confounder#131279
Record · ID 1538854
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive