Figshare
open access
CC BY 4.0
Divergence between university SDG reporting and the Impact ranking profiles: implications for accountability
Universities communicate their contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through institution-wide sustainability reports and through external ranking systems, but these public channels are produced by different mechanisms. This study examines two related questions: how review-read
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
2026-11-05T10:45:02Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai The request includes illegal arguments, is missing required arguments, includes a repeated argument, or values for arguments have an illegal syntax.
Related documents
- Measuring the relationship between reporting on biodiversity actions and its determinants to achieve SDGs: insights from UK higher education institutions (HEIs)#259714
- GOVERNANCE, EDUCATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA#1507216
- Effects of Education Budget Cuts on Diversity and Inclusion at Dutch Universities#15989
- Standardised predictive linear models of managerial processes and the sustainability of graduate programmes (SGPs) in universities: A case study#758528
- Corporate Accountability Towards Species Extinction Protection: Insights from Ecologically Forward-Thinking Companies#259710
Record · ID 1553121 · SHA-256 de582bf1b6421550
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive