Figshare
open access
CC BY 4.0
When does naming a problem evaluate AI? Problem attribution and Appraisal in Weibo discourse on educational AI
appraisalartificial-intelligence-in-educationcomputational-linguisticscorpus-linguisticsevaluationregister
Replication package for the article "When does naming a problem evaluate AI? Problem attribution and Appraisal in Weibo discourse on educational AI". It contains the released annotation codes for 9,766 clause-level units of Weibo discourse on educational AI (2023-2025, without post text
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
2026-11-07T10:46:40Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai The request includes illegal arguments, is missing required arguments, includes a repeated argument, or values for arguments have an illegal syntax.
Related documents
- Attributable by Construction: Claim-Anchored Provenance for Multi-Document Summarization#999818
- Large Language Models (LLMs) for Evidence Synthesis: An Exploratory Evaluation and A New Approach for Automated Data Extraction and Validation#260560
- Evaluating AI-Assisted Psychoeducational Report Writing: A Framework for Utility, Equity, and Defensibility#1098631
- Evaluating AI-Assisted Psychoeducational Report Writing: A Framework for Utility, Equity, and Defensibility#1098542
- AI in Education#666651
Record · ID 1588780 · SHA-256 cb072ee2e57433ea
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive