ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Neuroendoscopic Surgery With Ommaya Reservoir Implantation vs. Burr Hole Drainage for Infantile Postmeningitis Subdural Lesions: Superior Efficacy, Critical Impact of Surgical Timing, and Pathogenic Bacteria as Risk Factors for Progression
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Middle Meningeal Artery Coagulation During Burr-Hole Drainage for Chronic Subdural Haematoma (BURR-MMA)#802057
- Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.#25890
- Neuroendoscopy-assisted Drainage Versus Burr Hole Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematoma#1111668
- The Finnish Study of Intraoperative Irrigation Versus Drain Alone After Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (FINISH)#863145
- Days alive and out of hospital after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural haematoma: a national cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics in England.#25599
Record · ID 160224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive