CanLII
metadata only
Lloyd v. Bell Canada
Decided: 2026-11-05. Docket: A-327-26. Citation: 2026 FCA 185 (CanLII). Procedure — Motions — Appeal-related relief — Stay motion, confidentiality motion, and motion to supplement motion record — Motions dealt with in writing without appearance of parties — Federal Courts Rules, Rules 369(3) and 398 referenced — All three motions dismissed — Costs awarded on two motions — Motions dismissed | Procedure — Stay pending appeal — RJR-MacDonald test — Whether stay should be granted under Rule 398 — RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) and Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc. applied — Irreparable harm not proven, balance of convenience favours respondent — Stay refused | Procedure — Confidentiality order — Filing directions — Whether late confidentiality motion should be granted for
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Suppa Et Al. v. Canada (Attorney General) Et Al.#1079783
- Sui v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1481032
- Shamattawa First Nations v. Canada (Attorney General)#1266819
- Bakher v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1329474
- Cycle Toronto v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1090899
Record · ID 1615816
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive