arXiv (All)
open access
Measuring Weak-to-Strong Legibility of Reasoning Models
Language models are increasingly trained to "reason" before answering users' queries, outputting hundreds of intermediate tokens before a final answer. While reasoning is designed with direct model capabilities in mind, we argue that reasoning language models (RLMs) should also be assessed by intera
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trace Grafting: Cross-Model Reasoning in Large Language Model Code Generation#1092500
- Trace Grafting: Cross-Model Reasoning in Large Language Model Code Generation#1092484
- Argument Graph Uncertainty: Quantifying Uncertainty from the Logical Structure of Reasoning Chains#1355256
- Argument Graph Uncertainty: Quantifying Uncertainty from the Logical Structure of Reasoning Chains#1336038
- Learning When to Translate for Multilingual Reasoning#1342508
Record · ID 1624603
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive