PsyArXiv
metadata only
Developing human-AI complementarity: Augmenting everyday decision making with Large Language Models
Artificial intelligence (AI) can improve human judgement, but human–AI systems rarely achieve complementarity: combined performance exceeding that of both humans and AI alone. Across three longitudinal studies (N = 671), we tested whether large language models (LLMs) could support complementarity by
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cognitive performance in young and middle-aged adults with obesity: a systematic literature review#1627517
- Facilitation by Irrelevant Distractors Under High Perceptual Load: Suppression or Controlled Distractor Prioritization?#1627518
- Evaluating the Parental Burnout Assessment in parents of children with and without complex care needs: Measurement invariance, group differences, and the correlates of socio-demographic characteristics#1627519
- There is no time for time: a critical review of temporality within Social Representations Theory#1627520
- How Self-Location Predicts the Degree and Quality of the Felt Sense of Connection#1627521
Record · ID 1627516
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive