OSF
open access
Stimulus-category confounds reduce, but do not explain, different roles of intent across moral domains: Valid statistical inference helps explain ‘inconsistent’ findings
cognitive-neurosciencejudgment-and-decision-makingneurosciencesocial-and-personality-psychologystatistical-inference
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are Intuitions About Moral Relevance Susceptible to Framing Effects?#116665
- Traits and functions in the evolution of morality#766888
- Shifty morals#113368
- The Empirical Case for Folk Indexical Moral Relativism#700325
- Are psychopaths moral‐psychologically impaired? Reassessing emotion‐theoretical explanations#85758
Record · ID 162949
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive