OSF
open access
A Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Hypothesis Testing Adjustment Methods
false-discovery-ratephysical-sciences-and-mathematicsstatistical-methodologystatistics-and-probability
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Record Linkage Error and Inference in Population Research#439842
- Statistical Analysis for the Changing Criterion Design: Separating Intervention Effects from Secular Change#16235
- A Proposed Hybrid Effect Size Plus p -Value Criterion: Empirical Evidence Supporting its Use#737149
- The Problem of Separate Hypotheses via Mixtures Models.#770983
- Prompt Coverage Adequacy#332589
Record · ID 16299 · SHA-256 325e26f627083b00
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive