arXiv (All)
open access
From User Behaviors to Satisfaction Judgments: Reasoning about User Satisfaction with AI Overviews
The growing presence of AI overviews in everyday search makes their effective evaluation essential. Response quality has been the primary focus of existing evaluation research, with only a small number of studies examining the user perspective. These evaluations rely on queries and response content,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficient Swing Computation for Retrieval in Large-Scale Recommender Systems#1122843
- Design and Evaluation of a Gamification-Based Mobile Application for Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions by Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Pilot Usability Study in Diabetes Care.#425172
- Consumer satisfaction with new content discovery through algorithmic and human recommendations#208729
- Evaluation of AI Chatbot Responses to a Standardized Patient Query on Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.#145942
- RealWorldShop: Benchmarking and Improving Conversational Shopping Agents in Real-World E-commerce#1143941
Record · ID 1634448
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive