WIPO
open access
A Look at the Compulsory License in Investment Arbitration: The Case of Indirect Expropriation
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Opening a pandora’s box in investment arbitration: Redefining the murky boundaries of compensable indirect expropriation and non-compensable regulation#938713
- Human rights issues in investment arbitration cases: A new perspective?#20419
- Duty and Discretion in International Arbitration#219806
- A Sociology of International Investment Law#343940
- Arbitration’s Protean Nature: The Value of Rules and the Risk of Discretion#240863
Record · ID 163703
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive