PhilArchive
open access
Bespoke Knowledge
A central finding of social epistemology is that phenomena desirable at the individual level might have hidden undesirable effects that emerge on the social level. These emergent effects have important implications for the management of values in science. Using a historical case study of the safety of hormonal pregnancy tests, I argue that the meta-analysis of studies risks compounding value-influence in undesirable ways. In statistical analysis, researchers must either constrain values such that they do not impact the measure of central tendency or accept that they have created “bespoke knowledge” which cannot be reused or exported to other contexts.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Value of Scientific Information—An Overview#621629
- Reactivity in Social Scientific experiments: What is it and how is it different (and worse) than a Placebo effect?#742923
- The role of cognitive values in the shaping of scientific rationality#731630
- Nonideal Theory and a Logic of Abduction#82019
- Communicating Science-Based Information about Risk: How Ethics Can Help#772802
Record · ID 164956
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive