PhilArchive
open access
The Exposed Cogito and the Birth of Ethics
This paper offers a first principles derivation of Resolution Ethics from the Cogito. It argues that the Cogito gives the first certainty from within experience, but not the final wall of reality. Once the I is understood as exposed rather than sealed, a minimal structure becomes visible: I and not-I, boundary, exposure, valence, resolution, authorship, and shared dependence. From that structure, the paper derives three minimum requirements of ethics: preserve authorship, track exposure truthfully, and honour shared dependence. The result is a Euclidean core of Resolution Theory: ethics is not imported from outside, but begins to unfold from exposed authorship itself.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In the Name of Merit: Six Gatekeeping Mechanisms, from the Hundred Schools of Thought to the Algorithmic Archive#688621
- The history of digital ethics#88610
- Hacking Digital Ethics#723340
- Louise Amoore: Cloud Ethics. Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others#757368
- THE JAMEEL DOCTRINE_ Humanity by Ethics_ Domination by Power#695086
Record · ID 165083
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive